FAQ
Q: What are you working on?
A: Look at the issue tracker
Q: Are you working on X?
A: Look at the issue tracker
Q: Are you still working on X?
A: Look at the issue tracker
Q: Is X finished?
A: Look at the issue tracker
Q: Did QA look at X?
A: Look at the issue trackerThen wait for 30 min, do the same. Then wait 3 hours, do the same.
What will happen? they will forget about it because it is irrelevant to them.
Therefore the scrum ceremonies are just bullshit and a waste of time.
Quod erat demonstrandum. Fuck scrum.
Double talk.
Plus, most implementations of Scrum are bullshit. Scrum does not recognize the role of a "project manager". There's the product owner, the scrum master and the development team. That's all.
The scrum master only exists to guarantee the process is followed. The scrum master is just a scrum evangelist, not a real leader.
I still can’t figure out how line managers and architects fit into a well run scrum environment. Seems they would be losing a lot of power.
You can read the official Scrum guide here, it's a few pages long:
https://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum...
I think Scrum exists only to expand the adoption of Scrum. That is at least the reason behind the role of "Scrum master".
By maximizing adoption, the authors can personally benefit and become rich and famous.
When I worked for a large multinational in SF, 100M+ users we operated very much in the “SV” style the article describes.
I got to see how our satellite offices in other parts of the world operate; EVERYTHING was in calendar, work was tracked in 15 minute intervals, meeting about meetings, and follow up meetings after the meeting, and a post mortum after. One project manager for every 3 engineers. Dealing with them I felt like I was looking some sort of Project Managers Gone Wild porn set
Then I moved away from the BA and found out most places are like this, it’s real bad