Re:The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
by londons_explore on Sunday January 10, 2021 @06:10PM
(#25721340)
> and the software is also available for free under the same or similar terms
This would be illegal in many countries. The business must behave in its best interests. If software is available for free, yet they choose to pay for it, they aren't acting in their own best interests in the eyes of the law....
Re:The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
by Denvercoder9 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @06:57PM
(#25721915)
Hence you pay for "support", not the software.
It sounds more like kelnos is paying for influence. Sort of like inviting your congressman to dinner and drinks rather than writing an email for free.
Re:The Future of Libjpeg-Turbo
by simongr3dal on Monday January 11, 2021 @09:34AM
(#25729268)
It would be in the interest of the software company that a open source dependency stays around and continues to get updates etc.
patio11's comment is about donating vs. paying by a business entity. Something I hadn't considered is that a business (even if it's just a one-person developer who has incorporated) can pay for software tax-free to any org as long as it's an actual business expense, since businesses (at least in the US, and I assume in Japan as well) are taxed on their profits, not on their gross income.
Patrick's issue with donating as a business makes sense: the tax authorities will look at a donation and think it's a part of a tax-avoidance scheme, but if the business pays for a license to software (even the payment is essentially a part of a custom license, and the software is also available for free under the same or similar terms), and has that payment documented, it's fine.