Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by JMTQp8lwXL on Sunday January 10, 2021 @08:49PM
(#25723209)
> It simply does not demonstrate that. It is not evidence of incitement. It just isn't.
Can you explain why exactly it isn't? This claim is repeatedly made, but it has no backing rationale which I would like to understand.
If you believe X because of evidence Y, it does not follow that Z must also be evidence of X, just because you believe X (even if this belief is correct).
Not having the critical self-awareness to recognize this is likely to lead you to believe all sort of things that aren't really true, as you start thinking that everything you see confirms your existing beliefs, even when it doesn't.