News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by thwarted on Sunday January 10, 2021 @11:57AM (#25716633)
It would be just as fast to give high level officials a textbox and a submit button that adds content to a web page.
Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:31PM (#25717023)
But if people are only reading on social media, then they will only see it when someone else posts it there (e.g. a newspaper). Or I’ll read it from a newspaper and it’s still filtered through someone’s perspective, unless it’s an op ed. To reach people directly, you need people to be regularly checking wherever you post. Probably what GP meant by being able to create the narrative better on social media.
Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by thwarted on Sunday January 10, 2021 @01:07PM (#25717462)
People won't continuously reload a web page that is a political leader's stream of thought?

Something can be a highly currated narrative and be accessible to everyone. Shit, people even have web browsers on their phones and computers these days. Social media in general, and Twitter in particular, does not encourage the creation of highly currated narratives.

We should probably invent a publish-subscribe distributed protocol for this, maybe some kind of Really Simple Syndication.

Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Sunday January 10, 2021 @07:11PM (#25722093)
> We should probably invent a publish-subscribe distributed protocol for this, maybe some kind of Really Simple Syndication.

+1 for that. Was RSS just too much effort to catch on? Or was discovery the issue? It's a great thing.

Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by pimlottc on Sunday January 10, 2021 @03:36PM (#25719413)
You can use the word “should” all you want, but the fact is that Twitter is where most people are today. And when you’re trying to your message out, that matters.
Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by travisjungroth on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:21PM (#25716902)
This is what makes me roll my eyes at anyone who says getting kicked of Twitter is being “silenced”. Make a web page and you have broader and more direct reach than almost anyone on Earth 20 years ago.
Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by acct776 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:37PM (#25717097)
But not today.
Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by bigwavedave on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:20PM (#25720010)
> But not today.

Exactly. That was kind of like telling a content creator to build a web site and post videos there after getting kicked off YouTube. Sure, only a fraction of their fanbase will start using their site to consume their content, but hey, at least they have a broader reach than almost anyone on Earth had 20 years ago.

Re:Twitter deletes China embassy's Xinjiang 'emancipation' t... by travisjungroth on Sunday January 10, 2021 @06:54PM (#25721873)
My point is that while it may suck, it’s not the violation of human rights that some people treat it as. So I understand if someone kicked off YouTube complains about it but I’m not going to entertain the idea they’ve been silenced.