News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The lesser-known Orwell: are his novels deserving of reap... by 082349872349872 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @02:26AM (#25711905)
not exactly untouched: after JFK was cancelled, Khruschev was in turn cancelled by his hardliners, and according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikita_Khrushchev#Removal said:

"Let them cope by themselves. I've done the main thing. Could anyone have dreamed of telling Stalin that he didn't suit us anymore and suggesting he retire? Not even a wet spot would have remained where we had been standing. Now everything is different. The fear is gone, and we can talk as equals. That's my contribution. I won't put up a fight."

Re:The lesser-known Orwell: are his novels deserving of reap... by watwut on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:16AM (#25712697)
None of them was cancelled, they were not protested against by students. They did not had twitter yet. It is stupid term to use in relation to 1954 Russia.

That is not what instability of regime means. It does not refer to individual being forced to retire. The regime itself was more stable then before. Khruschev retirement did not weakened nor endangered regime.

Stalin did changed people on top too. Some changes and power struggles after his death are not more instability or "touched" communism.

Khruschev was the first one retired. Powerful people before him left power dead (by execution) or by being imprisoned forever. That is being more stable.

It did became safer to both hold power and not to hold it in Russia after Stalin death.