Re:Wikipedia is 20
by Acrobatic_Road on Sunday January 10, 2021 @01:44AM
(#25711537)
I mean, anyone who has ever edited wikipedia can tell you. If you restrict your sources to ABC, CBS, CNN, NYT and friends, your article is going to read like a mainstream media story. And as the media gets more and more hysterical that starts to reflect on the quality of their articles.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> anyone who has ever edited wikipedia can tell you
Citation needed. Come on. You're retorting request for data on an anecdote with "other people also have anecdotes"
Re:Wikipedia is 20
by Acrobatic_Road on Sunday January 10, 2021 @02:20AM
(#25711869)
Okay okay. If you want to know how wikipedia feels about different news sources, they have a very nice article about it. It's even color coded. Green is considered reliable. Red is considered unreliable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Per...
So for instance, Wikipedia is seriously lacking in its cryptocurrency articles because you can't use coindesk or coin telegraph, even though they provide better coverage than CNBC and Bloomberg.