News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EFF's response to social media companies' decisions to bl... by xpe on Saturday January 09, 2021 @11:34PM (#25710093)
> but banning the president - who said LEAVE IN PEACE is what we should be doing.

This is not all he said, nor does this capture the key context.

The argument is simple: the risk of allowing Trump to continue to have access to Facebook and Twitter outweighs the benefit.

I would like to point out that the president has an unmatched ability to put out information, independent of social media, including: whitehouse.gov, press releases, press briefings, and the major television networks.

Re:EFF's response to social media companies' decisions to bl... by coderaptor on Saturday January 09, 2021 @11:43PM (#25710212)
I don’t have a ball in this match other than the one that wants to continue to raise my daughter without civil unrest. How are you so certain of the benefit of this action?
Re:EFF's response to social media companies' decisions to bl... by xpe on Saturday January 09, 2021 @11:59PM (#25710380)
Where did I say I was certain?