Because if Big Tech is taking a moral high ground I hope it can apply the same policies to itself.
Let's start with Twitter shall we?
How about this 2018 post:
https://twitter.com/MadamePete/status/1017462143279681541?s=...
What has Twitter done to take it down?
2019 post: https://twitter.com/jcmithnoy/status/1085855272793366529?s=1...
2016 post: https://twitter.com/lil_cmb/status/765737247781949444?s=19
2018 post: https://twitter.com/DutchessOfDork/status/100553860903276953...
Can I say that just because you are on Twitter you represent a political ideology aligned with the lunatics above? Looking at the tweets above can I say "I hope Twitter doesn't represent half of the country's ideology. I hope not".
This is the biggest irony of it all. Twitter openly bans right wing accounts while not doing anything to these violent posts by left wingers. you have toxicity in both Parler and Twitter. The only difference is that the right wing toxicity that existed in Twitter shifted to Parler while the left wing toxicity remained behind in Twitter itself. This is balkanization. This isn't solving the problem in any way, shape or form.
And don't even get me started on Facebook, Amazon and Instagram. These websites have promoted anti-Hindu content for years now. Keep reporting accounts and none of them are removed. It requires a massive boycott movement to get them to remove hate content. Take this for example:
https://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/news/amazon-india-hindu-sy...
"Amazon Takes Down Underwear, Doormat Listings With Hindu Symbols After India Backlash"
Why do they need a backlash to remove something that is obviously egregious?
Not exactly partisan for Twitter to let this slip. Whereas Parler seems to ban anything that argues against the repulsive shit their users share.