I haven't seen any reference regarding any email service, and to me that sounds something between unbelievable and an absurd excuse in light of the criticism of Hillary Clinton's use of a private email service.

And moreover doesn't the white house operate their official email service?

Regarding Facebook, all I've seen is a notice that an official page that wasn't used at all was suspended for a week. Does a temporary suspension of an account that's not used count as manipulating speech?

I understand the need to grasp as straws to find any excuse for outrage, but you have to do far better than that.

It was in a former title of this page, and if you'd followed the link and read the tweet you'd see it was about a service called Campaign Monitor:

> Email Marketing | Email Software | Campaign Monitor

That's the strap line for their website. Like many here, I often read the comments, sometimes without reading the linked site, but when commenting it does help to follow the link first.