News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google suspending Parler from the Google Play store by roenxi on Friday January 08, 2021 @08:23PM (#25694540)
You're allowing the BLM supporters to characterise their motivations, and the Trump opponents to characterise the motivations of this protest. That isn't fair.

Someone who turns up in a Viking hat, tattoos and a spear isn't looking for a fight. A person looking for a fight wears a mask, armour, carries a gun and probably camouflage.

Re:Google suspending Parler from the Google Play store by mumblemumble on Friday January 08, 2021 @09:11PM (#25695404)
When someone's prominently displaying white supremacist imagery on their torso, it's hardly putting words into their mouth to characterize them as a white supremacist.

When people wear imagery and slogans to any demonstration, I afford them the courtesy of understanding that what they're displaying on their bodies is part of the message they want to communicate.

Re:Google suspending Parler from the Google Play store by roenxi on Friday January 08, 2021 @09:49PM (#25695778)
Mr. Viking hat probably isn't an entire protest, even if his horns are intimidating. And even as a group the people storming the capitol probably don't represent most of the protestors, typically the bulk of protests are law abiding and peaceful and there are just a few bad eggs looking to cause trouble.

The core of the protest is electoral integrity and calls for the politically marginalised to have a voice, not racial supremacy.

Re:Google suspending Parler from the Google Play store by mumblemumble on Saturday January 09, 2021 @11:36AM (#25701768)
The stated purpose of the protest was to "take our country back" from the democratic majority.

That's not a few bad eggs. That's an enormous crowd of people all deciding, tacitly or not, consciously or not, that democracy isn't for them anymore. And phrases like "take our country back" aren't even subtle; anyone who's been paying attention recognizes them as dog whistles. The obvious indication is that this crowd believes the votes of the democratic majority are not legitimate because they came from people who aren't entitled to run the country. And, while we can certainly spend an entertaining afternoon sealioning about particular examples, it would be easier to just take a look at some of the wide angle shots of the crowd. The crowd is clearly communicating exactly who they think isn't entitled to have a voice in how the country is run, either explicitly by holding flags and banners, or implicitly by consenting to be represented by the people holding the flags and banners.