Inventing a ballot, forging a signature, and making sure you didn't vote for someone else who would later vote themselves... 11,800 times?
I'm sorry, but you need to provide evidence for that happening. Or evidence of how it COULD happen.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/a-warn...
[0]: https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/victor...
2) even that casual process caught 11% of the fraud
3) where is evidence of ANY sizable signature fraud? Your article indicates we should have caught about 11% of it, even without the more strict signature audit.
4) you still haven't answered how you find 11,800 people whose signatures you can fake, and be sure they won't ALSO vote at a later date, which would be detected.
We done yet?
No?
Prove it in court.
Or just accept the outcome of this election, and get started trying to improve security for the next election.
So to summarize: the only verification method was a name and a signature and the signature verification was rendered useless as a result of relaxed rule changes. Not that a signature verification is a reliable verification method, but this means the only verification mechanism in place other than a voter registration lookup was effectively removed. This means you could have voted absentee on someone else's behalf as long as a) you knew their name and that they were a registered voter, and b) could scribble on an envelope.
[0]: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/technology/georgia-recoun...