News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sci-Hub Founder Criticizes Sudden Twitter Ban over “Count... by jszymborski on Friday January 08, 2021 @10:07AM (#25685385)
This case is unlike movie or music distribution in there has been convenient online distribution of papers since arguably the dawn of the internet (ok, maybe "convenient" came later).

The difference is, the journal publisher groups realised they can continue charging extortionary prices and get rid of the competition of "free" paper websites by suing everything that moved.

Academics, generally getting slightly-less-than-free copies of the papers at their institutions and generally being apathetic about their universities being extorted, created a gulf and precluded any kind of pirate culture.

But publishers have since become emboldened, prices have risen, the inequality access has been increasingly advocated for and brought to light, and the open access journals had a bit of momentum for moment.

Honestly, if you ask me, the solution here is pretty simple (at least in some fields). Negotiate (if it's not already granted) the permission to publish manuscripts and pre-prints. Submit them to ArXiV or Bio/MedRxiv, or whatever repository.

This doesn't tackle the issue of academics paying publishers to send emails to other academics who in turn work for free to review papers, but one battle at a time.

Re:Sci-Hub Founder Criticizes Sudden Twitter Ban over “Count... by dcomp on Friday January 08, 2021 @10:34AM (#25685675)
Also when I was in academia (masters). If my university didn't subscribe to a journal (and it wasn't available via an inter-library loan (In the UK you can ask for a journal from another university)). I would just shoot an email to the author asking for a copy

Edit: Actually I usually sent emails even when we did have a hard copy but no online access. Just because I couldn't be bothered to find the physical copy

Re:Sci-Hub Founder Criticizes Sudden Twitter Ban over “Count... by jowsie on Friday January 08, 2021 @11:03AM (#25685998)
The issue with this is the authors of some papers either don't respond or simply aren't alive anymore.
Re:Sci-Hub Founder Criticizes Sudden Twitter Ban over “Count... by daotoad on Friday January 08, 2021 @01:20PM (#25687823)
It also scales really badly.

If a paper becomes prominent and many people want to read it, is it reasonable for the authors to be inundated with hundreds of requests for a copy?

What is the point of journals if we rely on word of mouth interactions to share information?

Re:Sci-Hub Founder Criticizes Sudden Twitter Ban over “Count... by pradn on Friday January 08, 2021 @03:14PM (#25689797)
In the humanities, authors often upload to Academia.EDU. It doesn't seem to have as much use among scientists.
Re:Sci-Hub Founder Criticizes Sudden Twitter Ban over “Count... by higerordermap on Friday January 08, 2021 @11:53PM (#25697213)
I think an appropriate solution is getting the prestigious reviewers of top journals to quit and move to open access model funded by the government. The difficult step is convincing the bureacracy at different levels (universities, govt) and of course preventing lobbying.