Re:WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebo...
by dan-robertson on Friday January 08, 2021 @09:24AM
(#25684980)
It is true that messages would be deniable if they weren’t authenticated. The design of signal’s protocol is such that messages are authenticated but deniable: it is possible for the recipient to determine that the message was genuine (the information you want to send) but it is not possible for a third party to prove that a message was authentic (the information you don’t want to leak).
See also, this article about doing the same for email: https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2020/11/16/ok-googl...
Re:WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebo...
by h_anna_h on Friday January 08, 2021 @12:34PM
(#25687234)
> The design of signal’s protocol is such that messages are authenticated but deniable: it is possible for the recipient to determine that the message was genuine
Via the use of MACs, yes. I never said otherwise. What I said before still holds, as the recipient you can't prove to others that you indeed received a message by a certain someone rather than forged it yourself to incriminate them.
> See also, this article about doing the same for email: https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2020/11/16/ok-googl...
The "Marisa" person in the comments is a friend of mine from IRC and I agree 100% with what she said.
By the way, do you know if the one receiving the messages can force messages that are marked as "disappearing" to be kept?