Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach
by baybal2 on Thursday January 07, 2021 @05:37PM
(#25678645)
Cannot agree with you on firearms point, but more or less on everything else.
https://mobile.twitter.com/JoshuaPotash/status/1347277542588...
If your aim is to stage a putsch for real, you wouldn't be bothered by some gun laws, you would've gone all in.
Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach
by anigbrowl on Friday January 08, 2021 @01:02PM
(#25687612)
The thing is, you don't want to get shut down before you start. There were in fact a few arrests for firearms possession earlier that morning, before the rally near the White House had convened. Once attention had shifted to the Capitol, I imagine there was much less police surveillance on the surrounding streets (until the National Guard were eventually deployed).
But you make a good point; perhaps the plotters over-relied on shock value and ended up half-assing it, or perhaps there was no more plan other than stirring up disorder and hoping to capitalize on an emergency situation.
I'm pessimistic about the long-term implications; the far right gave up on the idea of a political solution some time ago and the less far right is now about ready to join them.
But DC has rather strict laws about firearms, so it was rational to rely on a swarming approach and then try to exploit the gains from that tactic. While the attempt to take over the capitol failed insofar as Congress reconvened to finish the process of counting electoral college votes, and many of the participants have been or are about to be arrested, the far right has scored an outstanding propaganda victory (complete with photogenic martyrs) at little real cost. I would say 2021 has got off to a spectacular start for them.