> If our ancestors had this attitude, we might not have rage-builders being used daily by a third of living humans.

I agree. But we've got them now, so what will we do about it?

> I don't believe all problems are unsolvable, but I've seen many systems fail because they do not take human nature into account.

Me too. Let's say we did this and it didn't work - would this leave us in a worse state than before (excluding the development time involved)?

> I realize your proposal's intent is to help people realize they have this problem. I don't think it would do so very well.

You may be right! But how would we find out for sure?

Hypothetically: if the idea went to a vote (to try such an experiment here on HN), would you vote for or against, and why?

I'm not sure whether I'd vote for or against this proposal.

I probably would just ignore it entirely, if it was experimental and opt-in.

If it was required, I would probably stop using HN.

Despite trying to be a careful systems thinker and programmer, at my heart of hearts I am a mystic and an artist.

I suspect those parts of my worldview would be largely dismissed as drivel by people who are confident they know the truth and ideas that diverge from theirs as mine do aren't worth considering.