News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by recursive on Thursday January 07, 2021 @03:27PM (#25676935)
> Right, so we cannot assume it's profitable. It may or may not be.

That makes sense, but can you assume it's not profitable?

Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by unityByFreedom on Thursday January 07, 2021 @07:35PM (#25679704)
The inverse doesn't work. Musk has not yet demonstrated he runs a profitable company. That's the bar which Jobs, Gates, and many other CEO's have shown which Musk has not yet shown.
Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by recursive on Thursday January 07, 2021 @08:08PM (#25680055)
You said he hasn't run a profitable company, not that he "hasn't demonstrated he's run a profitable company".

He's definitely a different kind of CEO.

Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by unityByFreedom on Thursday January 07, 2021 @08:20PM (#25680171)
He's a liar. Promises self driving every year. Not even close
Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by recursive on Thursday January 07, 2021 @08:27PM (#25680229)
Oh, you're talking about promising stuff that's not delivered? Maybe not so different from the likes of Gates and Jobs.

Of course, sometimes they did manage to deliver some of the things the promised also, like Musk.

Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by unityByFreedom on Thursday January 07, 2021 @09:32PM (#25680771)
The inflated value of Tesla as a company is mostly based on full self driving whose status Musk has continually lied about for years. Gates/Jobs did nothing of the sort.
Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by recursive on Thursday January 07, 2021 @11:20PM (#25681471)
> The inflated value of Tesla as a company is mostly based on full self driving

I find this hard to believe. In fact I don't.

Re:Setting User-Agent Field? (1996) by unityByFreedom on Friday January 08, 2021 @01:26AM (#25682119)
Net expenses exceed net revenue, their cash comes from selling stock, and profits only come from selling regulatory credits given by governments.