News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebo... by dan-robertson on Thursday January 07, 2021 @02:28PM (#25675992)
It doesn’t feel like a feature to me. And neither does the lack of deniability. They both feel like things that leak information that doesn’t need to be leaked.
Re:WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebo... by mnw21cam on Friday January 08, 2021 @05:28AM (#25683315)
Perfect forward secrecy requires two-way real-time communication, in order to construct a session key that can't be computed from just the private keys and the encrypted message. Therefore the way that PGP's lack of perfect forward secrecy is a feature is that it allows an encrypted message to be generated in a way that doesn't require two-way real-time communication, and can therefore be sent by email.

The trade-off is that you then don't have perfect forward secrecy.

Re:WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebo... by dan-robertson on Friday January 08, 2021 @09:19AM (#25684936)
Why does signal still work when the other party is offline?
Re:WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebo... by hkt on Friday January 08, 2021 @04:07AM (#25682934)
Seems somewhat like threat model will determine the need for deniability etc. I don't consider myself to need it, and mine seems like a common enough case - compatible with a normal WhatsApp user's use case.