> He literally called them special and said that he loved them.

> he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to debate

Trump did not select those specific people out for praise ("the people invading the Capitol in Camp Auschwitz t-shirts were special and he loves them" - philk10), which was the implication. philk10's comment is ambiguous, which then goes on a derail about what words were used.

He didn’t single out any specific group: it was all-inclusive. As in, including those individuals. This isn’t debatable or ambiguous, and it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding of how words and language work to suggest otherwise.

> This isn’t debatable or ambiguous

"This" meaning the original point, was stated with an ambiguous point, as described.

> it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding

I laid out the progression, but you are ignoring it with misplaced hubris. That's fine. Good luck with whatever.