News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by giarc on Thursday January 07, 2021 @10:51AM (#25672366)
>85% of police officers voted for Tump in 2016.

That's likely a national statistic. Remember, these are police in DC, a very liberal area.

Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by robk on Thursday January 07, 2021 @11:42AM (#25673300)
On police salary they live in Calvert or Charles or Fauquier Counties which are still oases of red.
Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by jorblumesea on Thursday January 07, 2021 @12:14PM (#25673856)
Very few police officers actually live in the area they work in. Most live far outside the city in the suburbs or more red areas. Either due to cost of living or politics. This often contributes to the "us vs them" divide because the people policing neighborhoods are often from different areas, ethnicity, incomes and political leanings.
Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by cozzyd on Thursday January 07, 2021 @12:30PM (#25674165)
Even in places like Chicago where there is a residency requirement, most officers tend to live in "cop and firemen" neighborhoods on the outskirts of the city. This has some predictable consequences: https://blockclubchicago.org/2018/12/20/police-heavy-wards-g...
Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by wolrah on Thursday January 07, 2021 @12:40PM (#25674329)
> That's likely a national statistic. Remember, these are police in DC, a very liberal area.

Still cops. I personally know two DC area cops who are quite red. Remember, police organizations have been pushing the idea that anyone who protests police brutality is anti-cop and the right wing have more or less 100% stood by them or encouraged them.