Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach

Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by tsimionescu on Thursday January 07, 2021 @08:32AM (#25670783)

The GP is way off base suggesting both the dismissal and suicide of the entire police force responsible.

There is a massive difference between police keeping people out of a public building and police actively attacking even quasi-peaceful protesters like we've seen a lot of times during the BLM protests. I, for one, don't have a real problem with police launching tear gas at BLM protesters trying to enter the Portland courthouse. I do have a problem with police shooting rubber bullets and throwing tear gas at protesters on the streets chanting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Infosec implications of the US Capitol physical breach by jaybrendansmith on Thursday January 07, 2021 @09:56AM (#25671739)

I'm really getting tired of the what-about-ism here. They should ALL be prosecuted. Any violent protestors. Anyone that does property damage. Anyone protesting in a non-violent way should be allowed to do so. What we are seeing instead is peaceful, non-violent BLM protesters and journalists are shot and teargassed. Violent protestors are allowed to get away without prosecution. And Trump insurrectionists are allowed to walk into the most important federal building in the country, and then walk out. This is insane. As a country, we no longer know wrong from right, or up from down, or true from false. That is the definition of a major mental pathology.

[ Parent | on HN ]