News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Look at the CPU Security Mitigation Costs Three Years A... by martinesko36 on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @10:36PM (#25666993)
Does turning them off improve performance?
Re:A Look at the CPU Security Mitigation Costs Three Years A... by coolspot on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @11:01PM (#25667147)
Yes, very significantly, especially on old CPUs that don’t have hardware mitigations.
Re:A Look at the CPU Security Mitigation Costs Three Years A... by wokkel on Thursday January 07, 2021 @05:11AM (#25669335)
I've read the word "mitigation" so much (not only here, and not only you; so this comment is not directed at you personally) that I only hear doublespeak now: when people say mitigation I immediately think of a slab of concrete in the back of my car to compensate for not having any brakes installed. Please recognize for what it is: a design failure that is pampered upon. A mitigation is not a solution, it lessens the impact of the failure mode that was identified. Afaik, if the flushes and changes actually work, it is not a mitigation but a workaround: the failure mode cannot occur anymore. Mitigation sounds better than workaround though (and is probably the reason it was choosen).
Re:A Look at the CPU Security Mitigation Costs Three Years A... by bawolff on Thursday January 07, 2021 @06:51AM (#25669986)
Mitigation and work around mean the same thing.
Re:A Look at the CPU Security Mitigation Costs Three Years A... by wokkel on Thursday January 07, 2021 @08:49AM (#25670951)
Not really: mitigation lessens the effect, workaround avoids the effect.