Which are not intelligence agencies nor election officials. Anyone can sign an affidavit, it's not some magical paper.
If intelligence services or elections officials had found something, they would've announced it officially, instead they have announced the opposite. [0] [1]
> I'm thinking the blogs got it from him, not the other way around.
Trump is regularly retweeting information that has no other source or basis than theories created in the deep bowels of the internet. [2] (and hundreds more)
[0] https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-electio...
[1] https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-electio...
[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-la-ballots-idUS...
They are poll workers who claim (under penalty of perjury) to have witnessed illegal or election-tampering conduct.
> Trump is regularly retweeting information that has no other source or basis than theories created in the deep bowels of the internet.
Its presumptuous for you to pretend to know the sources available to POTUS.
>> There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.
This from the guy who was fired because he continued to claim there was no evidence when people were presenting evidence of election tampering and begging the government to investigate before the evidence trail grew cold.
Do you have a source for this comment? I'm pretty sure he heard about the allegations of fraud from actual purported witnesses who filed sworn affidavits. Those blogs that you're saying he gets the information from have hyperlinks to the documents filed by his legal team. I'm thinking the blogs got it from him, not the other way around.