Courts have not declined to hear anything about fraud, Trump's lawyers are the ones that have declined to call it fraud. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/us/politics/trump-giulian...

Wikipedia lists 3 resolved cases: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related...

Texas v. Pennsylvania: dismissed due to lack of standing.

Gohmert v. Pence: dismissed due to lack of standing and jurisdiction.

Tyler Kistner v. Steve Simon: ruled without hearing any real evidence, on the grounds that petitioners should have filed suit earlier.

You won't convince many people by citing the Epoch Times, which is a far-right Falun Gong mouthpiece that reports conspiracy theories incuding QAnon and antivax as news.

That "list" of evidence suffers from similar problems with conspiracies being reported as fact: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25662891

What does falun gong have to do with this?

The Epoch Times is a Falun Gong controlled publication that has rabidly supported Trump for the past several years. It's widely known.

Not trying to convince anyone, just answering the question. BTW I live in Europe, not a US citizen and not participating in US politics, only have a few friends who moved there.

I generally don’t care who writes or films stuff as long as the presented data is good, i.e. verifiable.