Re:Huawei Tops Intel as Top Linux Kernel Contributor for 5.10
by RyEgswuCsn on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @03:51PM
(#25662303)
Some of your points feel off to me:
Not really sure what examples you had in mind, but I would imagine most communities would have a preferred way for other people to address them; I don't think it's wrong for them to demand that. If you don't like China's demand then you can refer to it however you want; but they also have the freedom to dislike those who do that.
In my unpopular opinion: I would call them brainwashing camps, or re-education camps if there is no need to appeal to Western audiences. I don't think I have seen evidences that people have been systematically terminated in those camps, which I believe is a key characteristic for concentration camps.
Did you mean what you said seriously/literally? Or is it a phishing question to see which commenter speaks Chinese? ;)
I would argue that they didn't benefit much from "free speech", otherwise China would probably be mentioned in a more positive light nowadays. IMHO, China's state machinery is pretty good at internal censorship and propaganda due to their long authoritarian history, but their methods for manipulating/spinning narratives is rather unsophisticated compared to societies with more democratic traditions.
Capitalism has no backbone, I guess?
Your neighbour doesn't like you, and he thinks you are guilty of theft. You told him you have not done that and turned down his demand to enter your home to investigate. Your neighbour informed the police, and they come to your door with a warrant; this time you have to let them in. Is BBC the world police? If so then I guess China is at fault here.
I think WHO is much better qualified than BBC for investigating this, so not a great move from China. They should let them investigate.
I can see you don't know China at all. China does formally frown at corruption. The problem is China informally doesn't frown at corruption.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.