This comment helped me to think to find out – thank you – and indeed: https://www.batswithoutborders.org/role-of-bats-in-our-ecosy...
I see it such that we must learn from bats. And nature. And learn to collaborate better among ourselves.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/07/badger-c...
If you rationalize it like this, then why is it bad to slightly reduce human population?
I would guess-estimate that, if given the choice and the cognition, bats would likely also choose to self-preservate to the detriment of Humans.
As we can see with 7+ billions people on earth (or lemmings) too much reproduction threatens self-preservation, hence my previous comment.
If we take out any emotion and go by pure logic, a virus culling the herd doesn't seem to be a bad thing.
Now I'm like anyone else, I'd rather not be culled but I understand that if we don't find solutions, nature will.
I mean technically we already have a precedent with trying to stop mosquito reproduction to curb malaria and other mosquito transmitted diseases.
I understand that from a virology standpoint there is a lot to learn from bats and that they have an insanely robust immune system but is it really reasonable to allow these colonies to thrive unchecked with thousands of bats tightly packed together? It's just that it seems the most recent threats Ebola, MERS, SARS-Cov1, now SARS-Cov2, all seem to have had a bat colony as it's genetic origin.