>We don’t have agreement on time because everyone has their pet argument for why this or that time standard has some marginal benefit for a given slice of the population. Meanwhile, we can all agree on that those marginal benefits pale in comparison to the measured harms of changing clocks twice a year.

I'm confused. You contradict yourself from one sentence to the next.

Can we not agree, or are we all in agreement?

I say it's the former, not the latter.