U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings time permanent

Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti... by mfer on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:19PM (#25647865)

So, the issue is the time of day companies decide for their employees to work. Instead of shifting that time we should shift the way we handle time.

It's interesting how we try to solve problems.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti... by NikolaNovak on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:22PM (#25647912)

If a goal is for a myriad companies and entities of all shapes and sizes and with wildly differing priorities, timelines and focus, to all do exactly the same thing at exactly the same time... isn't a government decree exactly the right tool for the job?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti... by falcolas on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @03:35PM (#25650665)

> If a goal is for a myriad companies and entities of all shapes and sizes and with wildly differing priorities, timelines and focus, to all do exactly the same thing at exactly the same time

Liiiiike making everybody move over to DST before making the time permanent?

I mean, sure, we're pretty used to doing it, but that's a sunk cost fallacy, isn't it? Better to freeze the time zones before forcing everyone going through it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti... by wnoise on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @03:24PM (#25650532)

Yes, but why is the goal to make _everyone_ shift? I want a diversity of schedules so that commutes, errands, etc, are all more spread out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti... by whatever_dude on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:38PM (#25648206)

This. Making DST permanent is like buying an amplifier that goes from 2 to 11 instead of 1 to 10.

[ Parent | on HN ]