Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti...
by gecko on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:13PM
(#25647774)
Eh, it's just saying whether we'll stay an extra +0100 from UTC or not. I don't see a big deal. If people prefer the extra daylight in summer overall, then I don't really see it making a big difference.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti...
by kibwen on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:17PM
(#25647826)
I'm one of those people who would much prefer more sunlight in the afternoon, even at the expense of less sunlight in the morning. Sign me up for this bill.
Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti...
by wenc on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:27PM
(#25648018)
I don't mind either way, but it does make a difference for coordinating meetings and for international commerce.
Adding 1 hr is advantageous because it will give the Americas (UTC -8 to -5, minus Hawaii and Alaska) an extra usable overlap hour for meetings with Europe (~UTC 0 to +2), and with Asia-Pacific (~UTC +8 to +9) for 18 weeks of the year.
Europe observes daylight savings, but Asia largely doesn't [1]
Re:U.S. Bill H.R.69 introduced – To make daylight savings ti...
by jschulenklopper on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @02:19PM
(#25649736)
Abolishing DST (or rather: switching time twice per year) in Europe is planned as well.