Re:Why I'm Lukewarm on Graph Neural Networks
by dimatura on Monday January 04, 2021 @05:50PM
(#25639382)
I have to say I agree. NX is totally fine for the applications it was built for. I appreciate the simple API and the flexibility of using pure Python. There's a reason it's so popular.
I'm not an expert in graph neural networks, so can't really say much about the novelty of Node2Vec. But I do think it's often misguided to judge scientific work as trivial or incremental in retrospect. Specially in a relatively young field like deep learning, where four years (Node2Vec is from 2016) is a long time.
Re:Why I'm Lukewarm on Graph Neural Networks
by VHRanger on Monday January 04, 2021 @02:54PM
(#25636937)
I never said NX is bad, but it is for "baby" graphs. NX can't scale past a few hundred thousand nodes.
I appreciate NX's place in the ecosystem, but its implementation leaves a large gap to be filled for an intermediate library that is a Pandas analogue for graphs.
If you're offended by (say) research papers that fail to break enough new ground to satisfy you, sorry about your luck, but again, not everyone's optimizing the same function as you. You'll probably do better bringing people around when you're not implying (or outright saying) their work is shit.