News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slack is down by Aperocky on Monday January 04, 2021 @11:22AM (#25633391)
Does Uber/Slack not release in CI/CD? At least in backend?

I don't see any need to deploy a big change at once in the software world today. At worst feature gate the thing you want to do and run it in a beta environment, but still push the actual code down the pipeline.

Re:Slack is down by exhaze on Monday January 04, 2021 @11:28AM (#25633511)
> run it in a beta environment

Every Uber/ex-Uber engineer is nervously chuckling at this comment right now

Re:Slack is down by cgtyoder on Monday January 04, 2021 @10:40PM (#25641782)
As the saying goes, Everyone has a Test environment. Some people are lucky enough to have that distinct from Production.
Re:Slack is down by aeyes on Monday January 04, 2021 @11:53AM (#25633979)
For those that don't know what this comment is about: https://eng.uber.com/multitenancy-microservice-architecture/
Re:Slack is down by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday January 04, 2021 @12:26PM (#25634663)
I'm actually more confused after reading that. I assumed that you meant that tested in production on purpose, but it sounds, at a skim, like they do non-prod testing environments - in fact, it looks like they've gone to having multiple beta environments of every service?
Re:Slack is down by aeyes on Monday January 04, 2021 @02:02PM (#25636230)
My understanding is that they have a "tenancy" variable in every service call which can take a different code path. They seem to only have one environment for everything and do tests/experiments at code level based on this variable.
Re:Slack is down by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday January 04, 2021 @02:59PM (#25637024)
Ah, thanks; that explains it nicely
Re:Slack is down by xtracto on Monday January 04, 2021 @12:24PM (#25634632)
Aaah the wonders of not having to be PCI or SOC2 compliant...