Why am I not surprised that super-liberal Slate says my right to privacy should be overlooked because some idiot with an iphone wants to record every conversation?

Pervasiveness-of-technology should not ever be a reason to obviate the rights of the individual.

A handful of states require two-party consent (technically, all-party consent), a policy that is widely considered outdated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#...