News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ECC matters by andrewstuart2 on Sunday January 03, 2021 @06:22PM (#25626263)
If you or anybody can remember the source article, that sounds like an interesting read!

Edit: found one with a quick search. https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/08/10/bh-2011-bit-squa...

And https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262273269_Bitsquatt...

Re:ECC matters by garaetjjte on Sunday January 03, 2021 @06:29PM (#25626313)
Here's original paper: http://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-11/Dinaburg/BH_US_11_Dinabur...

But I'm not entirely convinced that most of these requests weren't just typos. Though those requests with mismatched Host header surely were true bitflips.

Re:ECC matters by tyoma on Sunday January 03, 2021 @09:39PM (#25627430)
There was some follow up work as well: http://blog.dinaburg.org/2013/09/bitsquatting-at-defcon21-an...

And I am beyond certain they were not typos; the requests were for long URLs that no one would be typing by hand. A few were for services that humans never enter urls into (like the Windows crash reporter).

Re:ECC matters by fart32 on Monday January 04, 2021 @12:54AM (#25628271)
Also here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXY3jm34RFU

I can't find it right now, but I also saw someone doing this with some version of Google Now (or what it was back then) and serving different assets into it.