Re:Unanswered user makes question their MS thesis and answer...
by kristianp on Sunday January 03, 2021 @04:18PM
(#25625336)
The answer compares resizing performance of their application to spotify's Electron app, which has a chrome browser doing the rendering. Not a very fair comparison. I assume their thesis doesn't do that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unanswered user makes question their MS thesis and answer...
by bestest on Sunday January 03, 2021 @05:47PM
(#25625971)
As far as I understand Spotify does not use Electron, it uses the Chromium Embedded Framework.
Re:Unanswered user makes question their MS thesis and answer...
by nefitty on Monday January 04, 2021 @03:22AM
(#25628852)
You are correct: https://www.spotify.com/us/opensource/
Re:Unanswered user makes question their MS thesis and answer...
by pulp_user on Monday January 04, 2021 @05:05PM
(#25638896)
(OP here) I adressed that caveat in the late part of the answer. I also noted that I don't even think the performance difference is attributable to immediate vs retained mode. This was just a comparison agains existing applications.
As far as I am concerned though, it is pretty irrelevant to the user if an application is slow because the developer made a mistake, or because they wanted it that way.
Re:Unanswered user makes question their MS thesis and answer...
by krageon on Monday January 04, 2021 @06:39AM
(#25630062)
It's fair because they're both GUIs. It shouldn't have to be anyone's problem that a set of developers chose to pack a whole browser inside of their user interface.
Re:Unanswered user makes question their MS thesis and answer...
by bmm6o on Monday January 04, 2021 @12:18PM
(#25634492)
If the question is about comparing the performance of immediate mode and retained mode, the comparison should be between two otherwise-similar applications. There are a lot of applications that are faster than Spotify, but that says more about Spotify than about those applications.