News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ECC matters by js2 on Sunday January 03, 2021 @01:28PM (#25623751)
Depends what you mean by supported. Semi-offically:

ECC is not disabled. It works, but not validated for our consumer client platform.

Validated means run it through server/workstation grade testing. For the first Ryzen processors, focused on the prosumer / gaming market, this feature is enabled and working but not validated by AMD. You should not have issues creating a whitebox homelab or NAS with ECC memory enabled.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_crea...

Re:ECC matters by theevilsharpie on Sunday January 03, 2021 @01:41PM (#25623896)
AMD may claim not to validate ECC on Ryzen, but it's working well enough for major motherboard vendors to market Ryzen motherboards with ECC advertised as a feature.

ECC support not being "validated," for all practical purposes, simply means that board vendors can advertise a board lacking ECC support as compatible with AMD's AM4 platform, without getting a nasty letter from AMD's lawyers.

Re:ECC matters by adrian_b on Sunday January 03, 2021 @02:30PM (#25624379)
Yes there is a risk to buy a Ryzen CPU with non-functional ECC.

However, I use only computers with ECC, previously only Xeons, but in the last years I have replaced many of them with Ryzens, all of which work OK with ECC memory.

When having to choose between a very small risk of losing the price of a CPU and having to use for sure, during many years, an Intel CPU with half of the AMD speed, the choice was very obvious for me.

Re:ECC matters by loeg on Sunday January 03, 2021 @05:36PM (#25625885)
Your quote is for consumer platforms (Ryzen) only; GP's statement was that ECC is not well-supported on AMD at all, which is obviously false (EPYC, Threadripper).