News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pentagon Puts F-35 Full-Rate Production Decision on Hold by baybal2 on Saturday January 02, 2021 @09:12PM (#25618699)
You need 10 F-35 to down 40 drones in an ideal scenario of 1 missile per drone.

In real conflict, I doubt anybody with a $120m plane would even think of trading it, and a pilot for a drone.

Even a minimal attrition rates like 1 in 40, mean an attrition loss.

Re:Pentagon Puts F-35 Full-Rate Production Decision on Hold by jariel on Saturday January 02, 2021 @09:20PM (#25618738)
Ok, but nobody can actually field that many drones (remember it's not just the craft, it's pilot, tech ground support, comms, rads, networks, etc.) especially in a scenario they are not suited for, and, it's not as though the F35's wouldn't also be supported by drones and other support.

We know the 1st wave will be done-on-drone for sure ...

... but the idea Russia is going to be able to man and send up 400 drones (!) for even a single opposing squadron is just far fetched.

40 drones out over the Black Sea? Maybe. But again, as they are 'slow lumbering targets' they will be mopped up pretty quick by a single squadron of F35 and whatever other ground/naval forces are in the region.

Every drone in the air facing a capable enemy is basically on a suicide mission.

Re:Pentagon Puts F-35 Full-Rate Production Decision on Hold by petre on Sunday January 03, 2021 @02:09AM (#25620149)
This can be fixed with new, smaller anti drone AA missiles. One doesn't need a full Sidewinder missile to blow up a drone. Even purely kinetic missiles without an explosive charge are usable on smaller drones.

There are already many ground based anti drone platforms such as Rafael Systems' Drone Done which can be installed on a pickup truck. If Armenia had any of those, they woulld have had an advantage in the recent war with Azerbaidjan.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/air-and-missile-war-nagorno-ka...