News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Atlassian Cloud ToS section 3.3(I) prohibits discussing performance issues. Parent comment

Re:Atlassian Cloud ToS section 3.3(I) prohibits discussing p... by Judgmentality on Saturday January 02, 2021 @07:31PM (#25618137)
If that's true, the fact that they aren't dogfooding their own product makes me 100% confident they will fail.

I'm actually going to look into shorting Atlassian now.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Atlassian Cloud ToS section 3.3(I) prohibits discussing p... by uuuugh on Saturday January 02, 2021 @10:07PM (#25618988)
What the guy above said is not true. Jira Cloud uses Jira Cloud to manage their projects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY91A_4Mbts

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Atlassian Cloud ToS section 3.3(I) prohibits discussing p... by confluence_perf on Saturday January 02, 2021 @10:36PM (#25619153)
Both right

a) the public facing jira.atlassian.com is Server/DC instance - but this instance is only used for customer/outside world facing tickets (I think)

b) internally for our own development we use a few (several?) cloud instances -> but I can only speak to those I interact with (Conf Cloud and Jira Cloud primarily).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Atlassian Cloud ToS section 3.3(I) prohibits discussing p... by uuuugh on Monday January 04, 2021 @08:10AM (#25630827)
I used to work on Jira and it frustrates me seeing people say we don't dogfood our products when internally we do everything on a staging instance. jira.atlassian.com is not something developers use, and is a public facing instance.
[ Parent | on HN ]