News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open Source Smartwatch by beagle3 on Saturday January 02, 2021 @07:06PM (#25617957)
> you're selling hardware that is almost a decade old and can't be used as a daily driver today.

My iPhone 6S is more than 5 years old, and is perfectly usable as a daily driver (and my SO's iPhone 6 is too - it's 6 years old, only runs iOS 12, but still gets security updates and is perfectly usable).

It's fine if on the freedom/performance/up-to-dateness tradeoff, you're not pine64's customer.

Many people are.

Re:Open Source Smartwatch by comex on Saturday January 02, 2021 @07:26PM (#25618098)
If you’re talking about 5-year-old Apple products, the first Apple Watch is also 5 years old and runs at 520 MHz with 512 MB of RAM. I expect it too is usable. But that’s quite a bit different from 64 MHz and 64 KB of RAM.
Re:Open Source Smartwatch by saagarjha on Sunday January 03, 2021 @02:05AM (#25620132)
I wouldn’t be too sure of that. It was slow out of the gate and got progressively worse as time went on; it’s entirely possible that a much slower device might feel more responsive.
Re:Open Source Smartwatch by Eric_WVGG on Saturday January 02, 2021 @11:51PM (#25619556)
That's a kind of a… difficult comparison. The 6S was right when Apple shifted from chips that were highly competitive to chips that were ridiculously overpowered.

If you're making a point about 5-year-old hardware being still useful today, I think you need to reference typical 5-year-old hardware. The 6S was weird (albeit in a good way).

Re:Open Source Smartwatch by saagarjha on Sunday January 03, 2021 @02:05AM (#25620135)
iPhone 5s on iOS 12 was a fairly decent phone.