Re:Peer-reviewed papers are getting increasingly boring
by frongpik on Friday January 01, 2021 @07:01PM
(#25608690)
I'd assign scientists a "pension" every time they make a worthy discovery. That pension would be a monthly payment of a fixed dollar amount, it would be inalienable and paid for the rest of the scientist's life regardless of other achievements. Publishing a minor, but worthy, paper would give a 100 usd/month grant. Getting a Nobel prize would give, say, 1 million a year. However the deflation would gradually erase value of the grants.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Peer-reviewed papers are getting increasingly boring
by seotut2 on Friday January 01, 2021 @07:39PM
(#25608989)
How would that fix the actual problem? And how do you judge what is a worthy discovery and what isn't?
As parent said, UBI would probably fix the incentive scheme, your solution wouldn't. You need to decouple the reward from the result so that research is done out of sheer curiosity and love of science.
Re:Peer-reviewed papers are getting increasingly boring
by andi999 on Saturday January 02, 2021 @10:11AM
(#25613283)
You cant decouple this (fully) with UBI. Only a little research is done at a desk, a lot need equipment, sometimes very expensive. With UBI you just get the time but not the stuff.
Re:Peer-reviewed papers are getting increasingly boring
by Too on Sunday January 03, 2021 @05:40AM
(#25620972)
This was the original intention of patents. Let market value decide if the discovery was worthy and let inventor earn from license of it. We all know that's not how it works today though thanks to sloppy patent office and abusing patent trolls.