Did you just guess at what it's about out of thin air with absolutely no context of your own?

Because it's very clearly not about GitHub and branch names - it's the ongoing thing with Pedro Domingos.

If you don't know, best to not just guess especially when it's a contentious subject where people are already clearly super frought. That's probably why you got down-voted heavily.

So you think github renaming its default branch restricts their freedom of speech? I'm confused...

IMO it doesn't.

But if it becomes the default for the 56 million GitHub developers, is it really freedom of speech?

I don't disagree with renaming the default branch and I've been using the name develop as the default branch for 2 years now, but I am still not sure that changing it globally on a global platform qualifies as "good behaviour".

Edit:

If you disagree, can you please write a comment stating why you do?

It would be very helpful, if I am saying something obviously wrong I would love to understand why.

Thanks!

This is the only comment of yours I see in this thread.

The comment was edited. It was originally about Github renaming master to main.