Re:It takes a lot of energy for machines to learn
by dragonwriter on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @11:37PM
(#25589642)
> I'd give 30(realistically 15) years tops for AGI.
I think 30 years is probably reasonable, if for “30 years” one reads “twice as long from now as commercially viable fusion generation actually was when first widely hailed as 15 years away”.
I think 30 years is probably reasonable, if for “30 years” one reads “twice as long from now as commercially viable fusion generation actually was when first widely hailed as 15 years away”.