Re:Amazon still hasn’t fixed its problem with bait-and-switc...
by dingaling on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @05:54PM
(#25587252)
> What does that mean in practice?
Buy the company with loans, strip the tangible assets for cash, burden the company with the loan repayments and bail out.
Basically use the company as leverage to buy it, and then make it pay for having been bought out. It will seldom be able to do so, and eventually will stagger into bankruptcy. Both the company and the creditors lose, but not the 'investors'.
Re:Amazon still hasn’t fixed its problem with bait-and-switc...
by cratermoon on Thursday December 31, 2020 @05:00PM
(#25597671)
This is the best 3x5 card/elevator pitch version of the private equity playbook that I've seen. The part about making the company pay the 'investors' for buying the company is especially poignant.
If anyone never quite "got" the rancor directed at Mitt Romney for his association with Bain Capital, this should clear it up.
Re:Amazon still hasn’t fixed its problem with bait-and-switc...
by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @06:53PM
(#25587809)
Toys R Us aren't exactly blameless. They were pissing away tens of millions before the buyout for their Times square megastore.
Re:Amazon still hasn’t fixed its problem with bait-and-switc...
by genericone on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @03:45PM
(#25585877)
Low expected long term business value due to predicted market shifts. Compress all dwindling future value into an immediately extractable source of income at the cost of the existence of the business itself. Basically, squeeze the brand name dry until the brand name itself means nothing.
What does that mean in practice?