Re:Nintendo's use of surveillance and private investigators ...
by ryandrake on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @12:37PM
(#25583741)
Also, a lot of IoT devices happen to run minimal but functional operating systems. I personally think whether something counts as "general purpose" or not is a gray area and depends greatly on the manufacturer's intent, and it's pretty clear that these manufacturers do not intend for users to run arbitrary software on the devices they make.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nintendo's use of surveillance and private investigators ...
by yjftsjthsd-h on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @03:55PM
(#25585987)
I disagree with that; in my mind the distinction is not whether the manufacturer wants me to to run arbitrary code, but whether they expect/intend themselves to be able to run arbitrary code after the device is shipped. So ex. a dumb digital watch that just has time/date/alarm/stopwatch functions is fine because once it's sold the manufacturer never expects to update its code (and said code is probably on actual read-only ROM), but an Apple Watch is intended to run arbitrary code - just that Apple locks down that ability to code that they allow, which I do object to even though Apple never intended to let users run their own code at will.
Re:Nintendo's use of surveillance and private investigators ...
by swiley on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @04:34PM
(#25586398)
Most of them are a little more than minimal, almost all of the ones I've seen are running full buildroot Linux with tons of shell scripts gluing stuff together and the main app in C++.