That said, I'd give a higher priority for the language in my browser to be safe: some kind of correctness guarantee would be nice. Or even, while we're at it, some kind of way to analyze the script and say "this script GETS from urls x,y, and posts data d to z"

    local ffi = require("ffi")
    int = ffi.new("int")
    int = 10
    print(int)

    fsm = my_dsl[[
        start: foo
        stop:  quux
        foo -> bar
        foo -> baz
        bar -> foo
        baz -> quux
    ]]{ foo = function()
            code for foo here
        end,
        bar = function()
            code for bar here
        end,
        baz = function()
            code for baz here
        end,
        quux = function()
            code for quux here
        end
    }
    fsm.run()

    DEFINE(Traits.Position)[[
        float x;
        float y;
        float z;
    ]]
    DEFINE(Traits.Movement)[[
        float x;
        float y;
        float z;
    ]]
    DEFINE(Behaviors.do_movement){
        input={Traits.Position, Traits.Movement},
        output=Traits.Position,
        frequency=0.01,
	
        -- Update entities position
        fn = function (pos, mov)
            local delta = dark.timedelta
            new_pos = Traits.Position.new()
            new_pos.x = pos.x + (mov.x * delta)
            new_pos.y = pos.y + (mov.y * delta)
            new_pos.z = pos.z + (mov.z * delta)
            return new_pos
        end}

    -- Create a sample entity
    local entity = Entities.new()
    entity.add(Traits.Position, {1.0, 0.0, 0.0})
    entity.add(Traits.Movement, {0.0, -1.0, 0.0})

I definitely agree with the above.

Gilad Bracha complains about this at http://gbracha.blogspot.com/2011/03/truthiness-is-out-there....