News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Evidence on Poverty Traps from Rural Bangladesh [pdf] by jayski on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @09:55AM (#25570239)
sexual/romantic partners though. if youre living in a shitty apt with a 200 dollar phone, good luck getting interest from potential partners.

whereas the king was swimming in booty, and at the end of it all, that's what moves most of us mostly.

id argue few ppl really want a lambo for the engineering of it as a machine, they just want to be seen riding in it. 500 years ago a lambo was a fancy horse drawn carriage.

Re:Evidence on Poverty Traps from Rural Bangladesh [pdf] by jules on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @01:15PM (#25572877)
You're right, the king probably had more booty. Remember though that the king's wealth is many standard deviations above average, so we have to compare him to somebody who is many standard deviations more attractive than average.

In the modern world, one standard deviation of physical attractiveness matters way more for attracting sexual/romantic partners than does one standard deviation of wealth, especially so for genuine attraction.

Re:Evidence on Poverty Traps from Rural Bangladesh [pdf] by jayski on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @02:02PM (#25573441)
i agree with this.
Re:Evidence on Poverty Traps from Rural Bangladesh [pdf] by sokoloff on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @10:27AM (#25570596)
I'm married now, but I had what seemed like roughly an average amount of dating difficulty that wasn't significantly changed when I got a better apartment or better phone.