Re:Average Rent in San Francisco Has Dropped $1k This Year
by jeffbee on Monday December 28, 2020 @12:12PM
(#25560910)
Here's the thing: maintenance of existing infrastructure that serves existing residents is almost entirely paid for by astronomical "impact fees" paid by new developments. In the East Bay, 85% of EBMUD's maintenance (not capital!) budget is funded from impact fees. These can be really high. Any new dwelling in the East Bay pays a minimum of $26000 for water capacity and a minimum of $4100 for wastewater capacity. It's a big pyramid scheme and the existing residents better get a clue and permit some new construction, or the public utility districts are going to have to change their strategy and get all that money from annual assessments on existing properties.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Average Rent in San Francisco Has Dropped $1k This Year
by daniellarusso on Monday December 28, 2020 @12:17PM
(#25560956)
So, is the existing infrastructure well maintained in your opinion and adequate for existing use?
Re:Average Rent in San Francisco Has Dropped $1k This Year
by jeffbee on Monday December 28, 2020 @12:23PM
(#25561013)
That the SFPUC's facilities are adequate to water their 2.7 million existing customers seems like a fact which proves itself.
Re:Average Rent in San Francisco Has Dropped $1k This Year
by daniellarusso on Monday December 28, 2020 @12:36PM
(#25561131)
As long as people are getting water, nothing is wrong?
The city is losing 7 million gallons per day in leaks (this also includes firefighting).
Are there alot of fires daily?
Re:Average Rent in San Francisco Has Dropped $1k This Year
by jeffbee on Monday December 28, 2020 @12:39PM
(#25561172)
So it delivers 97% of the product to the user. Seems pretty good. What is your standard? According to the EPA the typical water system loses 16% to leaks, that means SFPUC is well above the typical system performance.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents...
Re:Average Rent in San Francisco Has Dropped $1k This Year
by daniellarusso on Monday December 28, 2020 @01:19PM
(#25561552)
Where are you getting 3% loss number from?
It seems to be over 10% is lost, based on the numbers in your prior comment.
As long as most places are leaking more, it is ok? Infrastructure relativism?