Re:90% of Waking Hours Spent Staring at Glowing Rectangles (...
by tim333 on Monday December 28, 2020 @08:24AM
(#25559000)
>minimal whitespace
Your examples seem to have plenty of whitespace, at least 1 and 2 do. That said I quite like whitespace.
I think there much to be said for sites that look like traditional nicely done books eg https://bikes-n-stuff.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/IMG_922... which is a look which evolved over many decades.
Re:90% of Waking Hours Spent Staring at Glowing Rectangles (...
by solarkraft on Sunday December 27, 2020 @11:42PM
(#25556735)
The silk icons are fine visually, but way too complex to tell them apart quickly. [2] looks like an example of the headache badly mixed typography can cause.
Those are opinions, of course, but I don't think the basics (like soothed senses) are controversial, many of which can be objectively studied.
Re:90% of Waking Hours Spent Staring at Glowing Rectangles (...
by neilpanchal on Monday December 28, 2020 @12:04AM
(#25556837)
2030 rectangles are back to pure retro forms! Most design today is based on trends, and hardly any objectivity: https://www.google.com/search?q=design+trends
Here are some relics with sane typography, iconic icons and compact UI [1][2][3].
[1] https://www.martinmajoor.com/6_my_philosophy.html
[2] http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/news