Re:Adopting Ruby 3 types with RBS
by _ZeD_ on Saturday December 26, 2020 @02:38AM
(#25542017)
regarding the "separate files" issue: I see in the python world (that support both external .pyi files and "inline" annotations) some obvious things:
- there is space for every solution (sometimes is really ugly to read type-annotated .py files, sometimes it's very clumsy to look to the associated .pyi files for types)
- the "in-line" approach is gaining popularity.
- the "external files" ease the transition (there are packages that only exposes .pyi files to extends the work of the autors that don't want to deal with them)
- there is space for every solution (sometimes is really ugly to read type-annotated .py files, sometimes it's very clumsy to look to the associated .pyi files for types)
- the "in-line" approach is gaining popularity.
- the "external files" ease the transition (there are packages that only exposes .pyi files to extends the work of the autors that don't want to deal with them)