News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What comes after Git? by gnufx on Friday December 25, 2020 @03:16PM (#25538725)
It didn't even require that. You fixed something from the immediately-buildable tarball that you'd rebuilt and tested, or even something that didn't need a rebuild (config, doc, interpreted source), and sent the change, perhaps using M-x diff-backup. You didn't have pull 100Mb of git stuff, figure out how to rebuild the build framework, find you hadn't got the submodules, prat about with a pull request, and then whatever demands it makes of you, etc.

I was fine with that as a maintainer too, on three very active major projects at one time (using a 48Mb Pentium 1). A maintainer's job is partly to make it easy for contributors, not for the maintainer, but tending the contributors will help in the end.

Re:What comes after Git? by u801e on Friday December 25, 2020 @09:13PM (#25540785)
> You fixed something from the immediately-buildable tarball that you'd rebuilt and tested

That entirely depends on whether the necessary libraries and headers are installed on the system you're using.

> even something that didn't need a rebuild (config, doc, interpreted source), and sent the change, perhaps using M-x diff-backup

Unless someone uses emacs and gnus or something similar, email clients could end up mangling the diff unless it was sent as an attachment (which would make reviewing the code and posting an inline response more difficult).