News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The NeurIPS 2020 broader impacts experiment. Parent comment

Re:The NeurIPS 2020 broader impacts experiment by CJefferson on Thursday December 24, 2020 @06:31PM (#25532600)
In general the rejected papers are never discussed by conferences, as the authors will want to keep their from being public until they can publish it.

I don't entirely agree with this, and some subjects are moving away from this way of working, but it is still very common in computing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The NeurIPS 2020 broader impacts experiment by dhairya on Thursday December 24, 2020 @07:10PM (#25532894)
I agree as well, it's valuable to see rejected papers or at the very least the reviews themselves.

It's interesting that some Neurips workshops are on OpenReview but Neurips itself is not. I've found great value in being able to read the reviews (both as a reviewer and learning how to do good reviews and as writer)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The NeurIPS 2020 broader impacts experiment by craigacp on Thursday December 24, 2020 @11:17PM (#25534147)
The reviews for published NeurIPS papers for at least the past 5 years are available from each paper's page on http://papers.neurips.cc.
[ Parent | on HN ]