Re:UK legal system assumes that computers don't have bugs
by phaemon on Wednesday December 23, 2020 @03:17PM
(#25521686)
Edit: or, of course, I could be a clueless twat who hadn't read the article properly and realized the context. Sorry, mea culpa.
> check, test and double check.
Clearly that's not what you want to do, because you want to assume the computer is wrong without evidence as you stated. Testing might provide some evidence.
> could not provide evidence that the software was wrong. But then, how on earth could they?
Well, I suppose they could "check, test and double check." Or is that unreasonable?
> check, test and double check.
Clearly that's not what you want to do, because you want to assume the computer is wrong without evidence as you stated. Testing might provide some evidence.
> could not provide evidence that the software was wrong. But then, how on earth could they?
Well, I suppose they could "check, test and double check." Or is that unreasonable?